Home > Border Radius > Border-radius Firefox Not Working

Border-radius Firefox Not Working


CSS 3. The border-radius property in WebKit accepts one or two values and uses them to style all four corners making a nice symmetric shape. I am using this code to make buttons for a site and I am having problems getting it to work cross browser. /* BACKGROUND GRADIENTS */ background: #A2C838; background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #A2C838, Do you ever run into any browser compatibility problems? http://basetelecom.net/border-radius/border-radius-not-working-in-firefox-3-6.html

Hi, it works fine for me. Kelson says:Comment » June 19th, 2007 at 6:10 pm And after messing around with that irregular-corner code, I think the reason it looks bad is that the smaller radius of 5px How can I use border-radius to create a collapsed table with rounded corners?1Firefox 3.6 Ignoring CSS3 border radius0Is border radius supposed to work the Firefox way or the Webkit way?1cell borders Peter Gasston says:Comment » June 19th, 2007 at 12:12 pm I've added an example of -webkit-border-radius: 5px 20px to the post; I have to say, the rendering is horrible. https://support.mozilla.org/questions/927769

Border Radius For All Browsers

Peter Gasston says:Comment » June 19th, 2007 at 9:24 am I've read that Konqueror supports -khtml-border-radius, but can't find any official confirmation, and can't get it to work. 03. Reply ↓ Mangesh Permalink to comment# May 28, 2013 it not woring in IE9 Reply ↓ hhjk Permalink to comment# August 5, 2013 ssfff kjgphsj lljb Reply ↓ Suresh Dhakal Permalink northfacedenalimensjackets.blinkweb.com says:Comment » October 28th, 2012 at 9:19 am I'm really loving the theme/design of your web site.

At first glance, it would appear that Mozilla are in the wrong; however, their implementation is due to the ambiguity I mentioned earlier. It's much easier to see, understand, and help with when you do that. fantasai says:Comment » September 13th, 2007 at 4:55 pm I'd just like to note that thanks to this discussion the CSSWG has adopted Mozilla's shorthand syntax. :) 24. Can I Use You can read more on the Mozilla Developer Center here.

It helped a lot. Webkit Border Radius My convert program lays everything out in MVC format, creates the CSS files, puts all commands in to use jQuery, standard Javascript functions, and more. says:Comment » June 17th, 2011 at 3:10 pm […] from version 5 onward), although again with some discrepancies from the current specification (see this article for further details of how older The new Firefox syntax allows you to define four different round or elliptical corners.

Anjanesh says:Comment » July 4th, 2007 at 5:15 am you *can* get identical rendering on WebKit and Gecko with a different radius on each corner. Css Anyway. I was checking continuously this weblog and I'm inspired! Now that they've professed to instill a level of standards compliance, I'm sure they're going to go to every extent and make every effort to do so.

Webkit Border Radius

This seems to work fine on chrome and on some versions of ie but not on firefox. http://www.the-art-of-web.com/css/border-radius/ mozilla Ask a question Sign In English Search Home Support Forum Firefox Rounded corners do not work in Firefox ... Border Radius For All Browsers Only a range of JavaScript patches which can be found by searching online. Moz Border Radius Not Working In order to conform to the CSS3 standard, Gecko 2.0 changed the handling of values to match the specification.

Web Designer Notebook » An Ode To Border-radius says:Comment » April 27th, 2009 at 9:01 am […] It's as easy as that! navigate here Heh. Thanks for the other ways to solve it though! –boundless08 Oct 9 '12 at 8:54 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote border-radius:10px; -moz-border-radius:10px; add border-radius in your css share|improve Let's get started! Box-shadow

I was about to kill someone with this non-rounded corners in %^&* firefox.   62. There is also no reason to use the non-standard prefixed version over the standard unprefixed version in any situation, since the entire point of vendor prefixes is to provide experimental implementations The asker is trying to create a border-radius. –Dan Prince Nov 29 '15 at 18:58 This does not provide an answer to the question. Check This Out nicero 1 solutions 2 answers Posted 6/21/12, 2:01 PM The following does work with version 12.0 and previouses, but it does not with version 13.0: -moz-border-radius-topright: 20px; -webkit-border-top-right-radius: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 20px;

message area is also consist of rounded corners. Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? Are you specifying them in the CSS with no prefix (i.e.

How do I make an alien technology feel alien?

If you can see the helpful and not helpful buttons they have rounded corners. What to do when your opponent doesn't play along in the opening? Infusion Design says:Comment » April 30th, 2009 at 10:51 am We've recently done a few sites utilising border-radius as a key feature of the design, among other things such as RGBA But I do agree with Kelson, if the border size isn't the same as the minor size, it looks much better. 13.

Hot Network Questions What is the meaning of "cow in the middle"? it works fine without adding -moz- also. Note particularly the change in syntax and the effect of passing two values to -webkit-border-radius as compared to the -moz-border-radius example above. this contact form Same problem here.

Build me a brick wall! We have a pretty good* newsletter. This is particularly useful when wanting to create a circle or elipse shape, but can be used any time you want the border radius to be directly correlated with the elements OH WELL!

Is adding the ‘tbl’ prefix to table names really a problem? CSS3 HOME CSS3 PREVIEW MODULE STATUS CSS SELECTORS TEST COMMUNITY NEWS ABOUT US 200719 Jun border-radius: Safari vs Mozilla by Peter Gasston Posted in CSS3 Previews, Declarations, Modules, W3C Add comments Apple vs Mozilla. […] 27. Matthew says:Comment » April 30th, 2009 at 3:21 pm Ya I've been doing this for awhile, however it doesn't validate properly, even as CSS3…yet.